Oil Exploration Economics: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Geological Basins

Harry Patria, Vid Adrison

Abstract

Oil exploration has been subject to economic research for decades. Earlier studies of exploration models are mostly discussed the behavior of exploration at the macro-level analysis such as field, firm, region, and continental. This paper then focuses on the geological and economic factors that determine the well-drilling decision at the micro-level using disaggregated panel data of 32 geological basins in Indonesia over the period of 2004–2013. This study shows that the number of drilled wells is determined significantly by the lag of success rate, lag of discovery size, lag of global oil price, and regional location of geological basin.

 

Abstrak

Eksplorasi migas telah menjadi subyek ekonomi dalam beberapa dekade. Studi-studi sebelumnya dengan model eksplorasi, kebanyakan mengembangkan model Fisher (1964), secara umum dikelompokkan oleh persamaan yang menjelaskan respons eksplorasi pada tingkat makro menggunakan lapangan, perusahaan, wilayah, dan kontinental. Paper ini fokus pada analisis faktor-faktor geologi dan ekonomi yang menentukan tingkat sumur pemboran pada tingkat mikro menggunakan data panel dari 32 basin di Indonesia dalam periode 2004–2013. Hasil empiris menunjukkan bahwa tingkat sumur pemboran ditentukan secara signifikan berdasarkan tingkat keberhasilan pemboran, ukuran temuan dan harga minyak pada tahun sebelumnya serta lokasi basin geologis.

Kata kunci: Pengeboran; Variabel Geologi; Variabel Ekonomi; Eksplorasi

JEL classifications: L71; Q35

Keywords

Drilling; Geological Variables; Economic Variables; Exploration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Attanasi, E 1979, ’The nature of firm expectations in petroleum exploration’, Land Economics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 299–312.

Attanasi, ED & Drew, LJ 1986, ’Field Expectation and the Determinants of Wildcat Drilling’, Southern Economic Journal (pre-1986), vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 53–67.

Boyce, JR & Nostbakken, L 2011, ’Exploration and Development of U.S. Oil and Gas Fields, 1955–2002’, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 35, pp. 891–908 .

Challa, K 1974, ’Investment and Return in Exploration and the Impact on Oil and Natural Gas Supply’, Energy Laboratory Report. No. MIT-EL 74-016, MIT Energy Lab.

Dahl, C & Duggan, TE 1998, ’Survey of Price Elasticities from Economic Exploration Models of US Oil and Gas Supply’, Journal of Energy Finance & Development, vol 2, pp. 129–169.

Erickson, EW & Spann, RM 1971, ’Suply in a Regulated Industry: the Case of Natural Gas’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol 2, no. 1, pp. 94–121.

Farzin, Y 2001, ’The Impact of oil price on additions to US proven reserves’, Resources and Energy Economics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 271-292

Fisher, FM 1964, Supply and Costs in the U.S. Petroleum Industry: Two Econometric Studies, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD

Forbes, KF & Zampelli, EM 2000, ’Technology and the Exploratory Success Rate in the U.S. Offshore’, The Energy Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 109–120.

Forbes, KF & Zampelli, EM 2002, ’Technology and the exploratory success rate in the U.S. onshore’, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 319–334.

Ghouri, SS 1991, ’World Oil and Gas Exploration Trends: A Comparative Study of National and US Private Companies’, Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.

Iledare, OO 1995, ’Simulating the effect of economic and policy incentives on natural gas drilling and gross reserve additions’, Resources and Energy Economics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261–279.

Iledare, OO, Pulsipher, A & Bauman, R 1999, ’Effects of an increasing role for independents on petroleum resource development in the gulf of Mexico OCS region’, The Energy Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 59–76.

Iledare, OO, Pulsipher, AG & Olatubi, WO 2000, ’Modeling Petroleum Productivity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region’, Energy Studies Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 86–95.

[IPA] Indonesian Petroleum Association 2012, ’The Role of Exploration in Meeting Indonesia’s Future Oil and Gas Needs’, presentation slide on ESDM-IPA Exploration Forum July 2012.

[IPA] Indonesian Petroleum Association 2014, ’Improving Oil and Gas Investment Climate in Indonesia’, presentation slide on Press Conference 2014 IPA Annual General Meeting.

Kolb, JA 1979, An econometric study of discoveries of natural gas and oil reserves in the United States, 1948 to 1970, Arno Press, New York.

Managi, S, Opaluch, JJ, Jin, D & Grigalunas, TA 2005, ’Technological Change and Petroleum Exploration in the Gulf of Mexico’, Energy Policy, vol. 33, pp. 619–632.

Mohn, K & Osmundsen, P 2008, ’Exploration Economics in a Regulated Petroleum Province: The Case of the Norwegian Continental Shelf’, Energy Economics, vol. 30, pp. 303–320.

Nasir, A 2011, ’Proyeksi Supply melalui Analisa Kegiatan Eksplorasi dan Penemuan Minyak dan Gas Bumi di Indonesia’, Thesis, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia.

Peseran, MH 1990, ’An Economic Analysis of Exploration and Extraction of Oil on the UK Continental Shelf’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. EE7.

Pindyck, RS 1978, ’The Regulatory Implications of Three Alternative Economic Supply Models of Natural Gas’, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 5, pp. 633–645.

SKK Migas 2015, Laporan Tahunan SKK Migas 2014. Available from: . [14 February 2015].

[USGS] U.S. Geological Survey 2007, Statisctics of Petroleum Exploration in the World Outside the United States and Canada Through 2001, U.S Department of the Interior. Circular 1288.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.